Nelson Rock and Mineral Club
The Permian-Triassic Debate
Another reason for interest in the river is that it helps to solve a lo ng-standing debate about the boundary between the Permian and Triassic periods. Since the rocks of the Wairoa valley were first mapped in the late nineteenth century, their exact age and stratigraphy has been subject to fierce disagreement. On the one hand, they contain fossils that are clearly of Permian age - in particular, the bivalve Atomodesma (image, right). On gthe othjer hand, they yield ammonites and other fossils that appear to be Triassic in age. The problem was that they didn't seem to appear in a logical sequence. South of Brightwater, for example, the Stephens Group is exposed as a wide series of sandstones, siltstones and mudstones which from their position and meagre fossil evidence are clearly Triassic in age. Amongst them, however, are large areas of limestone - some of them a kilometre or more in length - which contain distinctly Permian fossils. |
Atomodesma sp. from the Wairoa Valley
|
More dramatic events must nevertheless have occurred at times. In the fine sandstones, for example, we sometimes see scattered fragments of angular argillite, such as those in the image to the right.
Art first sight, these may not seem especially significant, but a question arises. To lay down such fine and uniform sandstone, the currents must have been rather gentle and slow. To move the argillite fragments (which are up to 10 cm in diameter), however, much more force is required. Yet the fragments remain angular and have not been rounded, so could not have been carried far. How, then, did the deposit form?
Argillite fragments in the Greville Formation |